Monday, October 31, 2011
Some Relations between Conceptual and Performance Art
He begins by specifying the two key focuses:
“Conceptual art might be considered as work that emphasised the underlying conditions of aesthetic experience: Language was seen as foremost among the conditions. Material for and sensory perceptions were made secondary to analyses of their discursive and institutional themes. Performance art, on the other hand, seems relatively straight forward to define, ‘as a form of art that happens at a particular time in a particular place where the artist engages in some sort of activity, usually before an audience’. The main difference between performance art and other modes of visual art practice, such as painting, photography and sculpture, is that it is a temporal action.”
The focus of the argument centres around Acconci’s Step Piece and it is argued that while it is a performance action, the existing work is documentation of the execution of written instructions. Therefore what the work provides is subject to a prior conceptual scheme. As a result, Kosuth argues, the work inquires into the very foundations of the concept of art itself.
ART & SPIRITUALITY - Cornelia Parker
Cornelia Parker's Mass (Colder Darker Matter) was originally featured in the 1997 Turner Prize Exhibition at the Tate Gallery. Parker's haunting installation was constructed from the charred remains of a Texas church that was struck by lightning. The Tate's Turner Prize brochure described the work as “chunks and splinters of charcoal…suspended from the ceiling to form the illusion of a cube, dense at the centre, thinning at the edges. It appears at once flat and three-dimensional, but never solid, almost disintegrating before our eyes.”
Deitch Projects' exhibition of Parker's Mass (Colder Darker Matter) was awarded the International Association of Art Critics Prize (US) for Best Show by an Emerging Artist in 1998.
Sunday, October 30, 2011
'Some Relations between Conceptual and Performance art' - Frazer Ward, Summary
Frazer first outlines the typical perceptions that surround performance and conceptual art and their relations to each other, most of all, their differences. He soon begins to outline their characteristics; Conceptual art with its emphasis on the public, rationality and the reverence it gives to language over material and the senses; Performance art confined by its temporality and its strong connection to the physical. But soon after these differences are brought to light, they are completely broken down. The symbiotic relationship that has manifested itself between the two over many decades becomes clearer. Though performance art has never been declared a movement as Conceptual or Minimalist art has, that also means it has had the advantage of being an “undercurrent” of almost all major art movements. After realising the part performance has had to play in art, it doesn’t seem too hard to picture it as a vital element in Conceptual art. Instead of naively observing them as separate entities, we gain insight into the way that the concept can breed aesthetic and physical qualities; and reversely, performance can breed conceptual branches. With these common threads one relies on the other and vice versa. Performance challenges the claims that conceptual art is in denial of its own burden of physicality and publicity while conceptual art incorporates Bochner’s claim that all art has a physical aspect. Even the rationality of conceptual art is questioned through Acconci’s Step Piece which as a performance also has a conceptual base found in the linguistic premise of the work. It shares nothing in common with rationality except for the fact that it possesses intention and carries it out as expected. In this one work the connections between performance and conceptual art become transparently clear.
One though that I had, which doesn’t really have an important connection to the text is the statement that presents the distinct difference in a work that explicitly reveals its ideational premise and an artist who dictates his/her intentions. It made me wonder if one or the other had a greater purpose to serve in contemporary art. Do we need work that gets us started, leaving us to create the work ourselves in a way, or would we benefit from work that tells it how it is without any grey areas. The former suggests a trust is present in the audience to responsibly handle the works potential by themselves; but I think the latter can have the upper hand from time to time, considering the audience isn’t always as well informed as the creator and not as inclined to apply the same attention, consideration or action to the work. The artist might find it more advantageous to just spell it out. I’m on the fence with these ideas but I think it may be an issue better considered on an artwork-to-artwork basis.
Friday, October 28, 2011
SUMMARY: 'Some Relations between Conceptual and Performance art' - Frazer Ward
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Relations Between Conceptual and Performance Art
My thoughts on Fraser Ward’s definitions
Conceptual: material form and sensory perception were made secondary to analyses of their discursive and institutional frames.
Performance: a form of art that happens at a particular time in a particular place where the artist engages in some sort of activity, usually before an audience
The main difference is that it is a temporal event or action.
I find Frazer Ward’s definitions quite conflicting.. I would never have, and still struggle to, view conceptual and performance art as separate entities. I don’t think that performance art can exist with out the precedence of conceptual art. Moreover, Ward claims that the main difference between the two forms is performance art’s transience, however documentation facilitates the materialization and sustained longevity of performance art with the use of film and photography.
Art and Architecture
The address is http://artandtoday2011-alexia.blogspot.com/
Couldn't copy and paste, not going to rewrite it. Sorry guys!
Some Relations between Conceptual and Performance Art
- I do not believe conceptual art is anti-elitist. Duchamp's intention to democratise the aesthetic language was not successful. The contemporary dialectic is an exclusive brand of knowledge that has failed to receive acceptance from the nonart (public) audience. It is art for artists. In which case, is it successful? Can it be legitimated considering the wider context of a rigorous and often collapsing global system? Is conceptual art necessary considering it exists as such a parochialised cultural activity? I hope so, but often doubt the fact.
- Definition is not description. Kosuth stated conceptual art is self-referential...is that not circular reasoning and hence a logical fallacy?
- Art practice: priority is given to the conceptual scheme found generally in linguistic formulation which is followed by the perceptual experience the artwork provides. This is not conceptual art for the concept does not refer here to intention of the manifest work. Intention deliberates a controlled outcome and the focus is on objecthood. Conceptual art is often undeterminable (chance-based) and planted in the procedure of art making itself.
- All art is manifestly physical. Performance art is distinguishable from conceptual art as being uninformed by the notion of relic. It exists in a splinter of time and place. The auratic experience of a performance is lost in the documentation procedure whereas other aesthetic mediums bless their physical outputs with substantial life force.
- Bochner: "There is no art that does not bear some burden of physicality. To deny it is to descend to irony." AGREED!
- Please comment! I've left questions open-ended for discussion. I haven't got any answers but since this is what we have involved ourselves in it's worth debating.
VANTAGE POINTS AND IMAGE WORLDS
By no means does this cultural transformation impede on social functioning but has defined the modern procedure for survival. The shift exists as a pan-cultural phenomenon. It multiplies the individual identity of places, objects and people so that the global collectivity is bound to a network of analogous experiences of information. The shift to digital technologies sees the hybridisation of human identity. Notably the collective and inherited memory is carried in verbal fragments as opposed to written histories. This is the birth of an oral culture.
The action of viewing becomes less self-conscious with emerging desires for total immersion in image-worlds. This is evidenced in the popularised use of video games and HD screens. Personally, this is a precarious situation. We are on the precipice of forfeiting responsibilities as viewers to make image-world distinct from immediate and physical experiences. We cannot naively allow images to be used duplicitously for wide circulation of misinformation and unjust attempts at social control. The creation of images is an innate facet of human activity. It is imperative to maintain a schismatical relationship between the viewing and the living of images.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
relations between conceptual and performance art
Performance Art- is a form of art that happens at a particular time in a particular place where the artists engages in some sort of activity, usually before an audience. It is usually a temporal event or action. It was not a 'movement' like many other art styles and it branches into many areas of art.
- Ian Burns 'Mirror Piece' (Conceptual) and Vito Acconci's 'Step Piece' (Performance). Comparing these works demonstrates the relationship between conceptual and performance art and the ways in which they can overlap and blur into each other. They "are engaged in a continuing dialogue, sometimes a conversation, sometimes an argument."
- Conceptual art is seen to have a certain amount of rationality.It tries to take away the outer shell of art and leaves us with the underscoring ideas and concepts of the work. (or at least that is the intention)
- Chris Burden's 'Shoot'- used his own body in his performance work, thoroughly irrational and works through a plan of what he was going to do, how he was going to do it etc. and it now only exists in documentation form.
- 'Mirror Piece' abandoned aesthetic authority, it was reproducible by anyone, it wasn't unique or authoritative in anyway.
- Mel Bochner, like many other artists isn't sure about the term 'Conceptual art' because it is unclear, hard to define and 'concept' could be confused with 'intention' (creating a work with an expected or intended outcome).
- Conceptual art might be seen to have been an attempt to demystify art and make it less elitist but audiences responded with hostility, specially 'non-art' audiences. It is easier for people to communicate on a visual level and while conceptual art of course has a visual element to it, the real point of the work is in the concept. People who aren't trained to pick out the ideas behind works find it much harder to engage with conceptual works so instead of making art less elitist in a way they had made it even more so.
- Acconci's 'Step Piece' tried to demystify art by bringing his audience into his home to watch him perform his work. This collapses the public exhibition space into the private production space for all to see. In this way Acconci's work overlaps with conceptual art practice.
- While conceptual art tries to forgo all notions of aesthetics there is no way of escaping that the visual, physical appearance of a work will always have an impact on its audience. Acconci's work interacts with his physicality.
- Performance art was an "undercurrent" in twentieth century art which surfaces through the century at different times.
- Conceptual art can be performance art and vice versa.
- Bruce Nauman's work 'Art Makeup' exists now only as documentation, the work is the documentation of the temporal performance.
- Conceptual art removed traditional elements of aesthetic expression form art and placed an 'Anybody can do this' attitude within. e.g. Sol LeWitt. This made conceptual art very hard to communicate.
Sunday, October 23, 2011
Art and Politics - Marcelo Cidade


Cidade is an artist who embraces politics in a less flamboyant or distinct way. He sees even the choice of becoming and artist a political act and that to be political one doesn't need to raise a flag or become a pamphleteer. His work like Direito de Imagem (Image Rights) he uses cardboard imitations of surveillance cameras to comment on the Big Brother complex in society and Amor e odio a Lygia Clark (2006) transforms brass knuckles into a symbol of companionship. I think the simple nature of his work divorces itself from the connotations of politics being a patriotic act really well and brings to light that political art, more than anything else, helps find new way to transform our society.
Saturday, October 22, 2011
ART & POLITICS - Gregor Schneider

The structure entraps, but it also protects. It’s a clear and safe space to stay at the beach.Gregor Schneider
Acts of Kindness by Michael Landy
Thursday, October 20, 2011
Art and the Archive
The film is directed by Mike Figgis and re-enacts a miners’ strike that took place in 1984 under the Thatcher government. To undertake the project, Deller relied on archive footage of the actual event as well as collaborating with those that participated in the original event to recreate it with accuracy. The piece attempts to give us a greater insight to the event through multiple perspective thanks to the reference of Archival accounts.
Art & Polotics
Art and the Archive

Though their work has probably been exhausted in terms of critical discussion, I thought the McDonald's works by the Chapman Bros. were a good example of artists fabricating their own archive using popular culture. This adaptation of a kind of primitivism to a fast food joint holds this dark and offensive motive towards both McDonald's and the cultures they borrow these styles from. Ironically, the Chapman Bros. have said that they "want to make McDonald's into a religion". In relation to art and archive, it shows how artists, while taking things completely out of context even at the risk of being racist and radically offensive, still manage to raise relevant questions about how we see institutions such as the fast food industry and how we wish to communicate those feelings to future generations. So now the most important question is not so much, how did McDonalds become so ingrained in our lives, but more - now that it is how do we deal with that?
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
ART AND POLITICS!
THE BIRTH OF REALISATION!
Theophile Gautier - “l’art pour l’art!” (art for arts sake)
Whilst politics had always been an undertone in the production of art, it was not until Frenchman Gautier, made a call for the opposite - aesthetics opposing didactic function - that politics in art became a prevalently discussed concept.
Art has not been without strong politics since this statement was made, whether it be seen in the Utopian cries of the Lissitsky, dark oppressional works, such as Picasso’s Guernica or the American dream being realised through the Abstract Expressionism of Pollock.
A ‘Culture of complaint’ was recognised in 1980’s art by critic Robert Hughes. This recognised the regularity with which artists were using ‘one dimensional message art’ to create a sense of civil victim-hood amongst the art community, despite no reason to do so.
Other critics, like Benjamin Buchloh, take aim against this idea, and believe that these artists are embracing their society by making use of its free speech and championing ideas of ‘the cultivation of pleasure’ a very capitalist ideology.
GUERRILLA GIRL!
Guerrilla Girls are an anonymous group of feminists devoted to fighting against sexism within the visual fine art world internationally. Started in New York City in 1985 to protest gender and racial inequality in the art world, members are known for the gorilla masks they wear to keep their anonymity.
Through their history the Guerrilla Girls have seen art and the world surrounding it evolve into a different place with issues changing since 1985. Tokenism is just one of the concerns challenged by the group today. Economic discrimination in art sales and the auction market is another. Women and artists of colour earn about 10-20% of what white men do for comparable artwork.
ART & ARCHITECTURE
Their work Big Bambu: You Can’t, You Don’t, and You Won’t Stop is a site specific work they made for the roof of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The structure is comprised of both structural and aesthetically placed poles and is at odds within the straight angles and ordered space of the museum space. Because of its exposure to the environment, the structure gets bleached by the sunlight and rejuvenated by rain, as well as casting complex shadows of line.
http://youtu.be/gMa4HGJjnmo
Marley Dawson Heavy Industry/Light Commercial
The overall show is strongly focused on kinetic sculpture, and the counter-balance discs allow audience participation allowing the audience to engage with the highly precise objects that seem to ignore the laws of inertia as they continually spin.
The Endless Loop tyres rotate perfectly in sync and each showcase the subtle markings of tyre tread and sidewall markings as a sort of unintentional aesthetic decoration
Vantage Point and Image Worlds
With this blurring of boundaries, the audience has also begun to view the actual event and its depiction in image as one and the same. As Burnett explains, we as an audience naturally convert representation into visualisation thus the event is “internalised, personalised and then discussed as if the images approximate ‘being there’”
An interesting point Burnett brings up is the time origin of a photograph. He argues that it may be the time of its taking or perhaps the time of its interpretation.
With the introduction of technology into photography, this has a profound change on the vantage point of the image and how it is perceived. According to Burnett, this elevates pictures to a level of truth that does not need validation of truth.
Vantage point (sorry its late)
Burnett begins to question our belief in the 'truth' of images. He asks what happens to the 'truth' when images are altered - eg photoshopped? The idea that someone can wipe certain elements from an image, or cause an addition to an image, is a very potent idea, as what if someone has only seen the altered image? that image, to them, is the original carrying all the authority of an original photograph - which in turn, depicts to documentational degree, what happened at the events and place where and when the photograph was taken. Maybe photos are just a way through which we re-imagine the past and if so how important is the original? He singles out reinvention, visualisation, imagination and retelling as some of the important aspects when considering images. He also make a serious point about the place an image takes in someones heart, in terms of sentimental value, due to its content. For example if a mother were to have a picture of her daughter, whom leived overseas on her mantle piece, she may talk to it, kiss it and for her, it takes the place of her daughter - when in reality it is simply ink and paper. The idea that this could physicallty be destroyed, and whilst nothing negative would actually happen to her daughter, the mother would still be distraught, and feel as though a part of her daughter were destroyed, as the image (due to her daughters absence) has taken the place of her daughter, and to the mother, is no longer simplya representation, but has become the real thing. If an image is that powerful, Burnett questions the morality in the alteration of images to suit a certain person or corporatinos agenda...
James out...
Art and Archive
here is a link to the work, - you also should all remember it, as we actyually saw it in person. too...
http://www.darrenknightgallery.com/artists/sofo/2011/FieldsTHM.htm
James out...
Art and Politics


Will Coles is an artist you may have seen around. He casts sculptures and puts many of them around sydney in public, including the washing machine in newtown, theres a tv around there too and he has stuck some remotes to the ground around waterloo. His works are obviously political, for example the bust of a soldier is has a covered mouth. Coles' statement is perhaps that soldiers are not allowed to speak out and against attrocities of war and must follow orders without asking questions. The plastic appearance of the bust makes it seem cheap and manufactured and insignificant, as opposed to marble and stone busts of iconic historical figures. The soldier wearing a tutu is comical yet the stare gives it a tone of seriousness that creates a sense of dark humour when looking at wars and the needlessness to get into them and lose so many lives. The colour and stance of the soldier is a reference to toy soldiers, implying that the individual soldier in a war is a toy in the political power's agenda.
Art and the Archive

Kylie Stillman is one of my favourite artists who cuts shapes into paper as well as old pretty books including law digests, encyclopeadias and novels. She takes these old books that often have no use anymore and turns them into sculptures, allowing the books to live on in a lasting work. The design that is cut into the books is what draws the most attention but the books themselves are more than just a material and relate to the design. For example, the image is a work called Barberry which I believe is made of World Book encyclopeadias which are now on cd or even online, I don't think I've use it in any form in years. The books were redundant so Kylie has created a barberry plant, a topic which would be found in encyclopeadias, and has given the books a new function and lasting memory. I also find interesting that she often does plants and trees, creating an image of where the paper for the books originated from.
Art and Politics
Christanto is an Indonesian artist who lives in Darwin and works in the field of art and politics. He works with performance, installation, sculpture, video, painting and works on paper. His subject matter relates to conflict among humankind, especially between those of different faiths and with different political beliefs and the disappearance of multitudes of Indonesian political dissidents during the mid-1960s purges, when Dadang’s father was lost without trace. He seeks to make a difference in the world with his art.
His 1996 work 'They Give Evidence' consisted of 16 figures of males and females standing in grid formation. They stand tall and naked representing displaced victims of oppression in Indonesia. In their outstretched arms the hold stiffened clothing that looks like its come straight off their bodies. The terracotta and fiberglass figures have empty dark holes where their eyes and mouth should be. They look a bit like an army of undead come to make their oppressors face up to their crimes. They stand there plainly as evidence of past atrocities. Viewers were allowed to move amongst the figures to observe their statuesque monumentality. The batik pattern on the clothing suggests their identities. After public protest the artist covered the naked bodies of the figures in black fabric.
“I am glad to say that many in Australia who have seen my work have been moved by it, reacted to it, are interested in its underlying themes, as distant as these may initially seem from their local reality”. Dadang Christanto
Dadang Christanto 'They Give Evidence' (1996), 16 figures, variable sizes, fibreglass mixed with terra cotta powder.